This is from the NY Times. The truth is the data didn't support their narrative so they hid it. Do you think they would hide the data if it showed the vaccines worked? Of course not!
Here’s the story on the CDC withholding data in the Gateway Pundit.
But blue pill people only read The New York Times.
CDC admits it withheld unfavorable data
Here’s the story in the NY Times which says:
Kristen Nordlund, a spokeswoman for the C.D.C., said the agency has been slow to release the different streams of data “because basically, at the end of the day, it’s not yet ready for prime time.” She said the agency’s “priority when gathering any data is to ensure that it’s accurate and actionable.” … But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.
Let’s be clear. The only way the vaccine data could be interpreted as ineffective by us “misinformation spreaders” is if the data shows the vaccines don’t work.
This is like the authors of the Bangladesh study not revealing that purple cloth masks showed no signal at all. Those authors deliberately hid that data from view to prevent mask hesitancy. They didn’t even mention it at all. Not a single sentence. Why? Because it destroys their study.
Similarly, the CDC long-standing policy is that no information can be released that may threaten the national vaccination initiative. This isn’t about public safety. This is about not letting the public know the vaccines are killing them.
Let’s be clear. The CDC hid the data because the data proves they were lying to us. That’s the real reason.
If the data was favorable, I guarantee you, they would be releasing it.