More Important Questions
How do we know the vaccines are safe?
Although we are being told by the media and authorities that these new vaccines are safe, the only rational answer is "we don't know".
The reality is all Covid 19 Vaccines are experimental, are only approved for emergency use and are STILL UNDER CLINICAL TRIAL. These new vaccines will not have full approval until 2023 (see document)
As of December 10th 2020, the Pfizer vaccine either has never been tested on, or is not recommended for:
-
People under sixteen years of age.
-
Pregnant women (or women intending to become pregnant in the near future).
-
People with serious co-morbidities.
-
People already taking other medications.
-
People who have allergies.
The duration of immunity is also unknown, due to limited data, as the studies have not yet been completed. Immunity is BELIEVED to last at least 2 months.
All UK spontaneous reports received between 4/01/21 and 28/02/21 for COVID-19 vaccine Oxford University/AstraZeneca
Pfizer Vaccine Package Insert
Note the mention of:
Other side effects (frequency unknown)
• severe allergic reaction
View Public Information Sheets prepared for UK Residents:
Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine (Comirnaty)
AstraZeneca /Oxford Covid 19 Vaccine
Click to enlarge images
What are the long term implications of a completely new type of experimental mRNA vaccine with no available long term safety or efficacy studies?
There are grave concerns from many doctors and scientists about the potential for massive overreaction of antibodies after being vaccinated when they later come in contact with any form of coronavirus - which could include a common cold or flu.
This delayed reaction was evident in previous animal studies undertaken during testing for the development of previous unsuccessful mRNA vaccines after the 2003 SARS outbreak according to many scientist and doctors including Dr Dolores Cahill, Prof of Immunology.
Many doctors state we won't know the full implications of this type of vaccine for at least 4 years - hence the usual 7+ years it takes for vaccinations to be developed and declared safe.
Are you willing to be a Guinea Pig when the survival rates for Covid are 99%+? Do you know anyone that has died or nearly died from Covid who didn't have an existing pre-morbidity?
STUDY: Salk Institute - Manufactured Spike Protein causes vascular cell damage
The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8
Another study published in December, 2020, in Neurobiology of Disease reported that the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins showed a direct negative impact on endothelial cells and provide “plausible explanations” for the neurological consequences observed in patients with COVID-19.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X
"Safety is the major concern for this type of vaccine"
"These vaccines can induce potent neutralising and protective responses in immunised animals but may induce antibodies that enhance infection by early human SARS-CoV and animal SARS-CoV–like viruses"
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/7/05-0219_article
Why is Australia cycling PCR tests at the threshold of 35 - 40 cycles?
(see figure 2 "Off Target Test Reactivity")
It is scientifically acknowledged tests cycled between 30 - 35 produce high rates of false positives, and tests cycled 35+ times are useless according to Dr Anthony Fauci. Businesses are being closed, schools shutdown, quarantines, border closures and other draconian measures are being imposed on the basis of these tests.
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/09/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/27182/20200905/positive-covid-19-test-results-accurate.htm
https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/questioning-unreliable-pcr-testing-is-hardly-trivial
Why do we need to risk taking an experimental vaccine when survival rates are similar to influenza?
Former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, Dr. Mike Yeadon, says:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.”
“You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects,”
CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates
Age 0-19 — 99.997%
Age 20-49 — 99.98%
Age 50-69 — 99.5%
Age 70+ — 94.6%
Source - Centers for Disease and Control 'CDC' updated on September 2020
Why have death rates not spiked around the world?
Are we really expected to believe that Influenza deaths have magically disappeared and all respiratory deaths are now due to the new threat of COVID, with statistically similar death rates as previously recorded data? The World Health Organisation estimated Covid19’s “official” death rate at 3.4%, but clinical studies done on Sars-Cov-2 put its actual case-fatality ratio at around 0.1%. Roughly equal that of regular season flu outbreaks.
Self-help guru Tony Robbins recently spoke about the lack of an increase in death rates, and also the fact that the John Hopkins University removed the stats, which were found using the wayback machine. Why is censorship necessary? What are they trying to hide?
The CDC also changed the way it coded death certificates for a Covid-caused death in March 2020, to include everyone for whom Covid is in any way contributory to the death - the only disease this is a requirement for and the first time the CDC has requested a change to the way deaths are recorded. Naturally this inflates the COVID 'death statistics' dramatically - even if it was not the actual cause of death, patients were asymptomatic and died of another pre-morbidity or there is only an assumption that COVID contributed to the death, without actual testing taking place.
This is one of the reasons various organisations are now calling for an investigation into the CDC.
The link below obtained by FOI in the UK SHOWS CLEARLY that death rates were HIGHER in the 1990's despite substantial population growth - from 57,134,377 in 1990 to 68,129,139 in 2021.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/495421-inflated-covid-19-fatality-rates/
Editors Note
The media often use the term "died with COVID"... 'Died with' is not 'died from' and there is a lot of grey area about the number of actual deaths solely attributed to the pandemic.
For some perspective, in 2017, influenza and pneumonia accounted for 4,269 deaths in Australia, and were the 9th leading cause of death (see source)
What happened to "flatten the curve"?
We were told that shutdowns of borders, business and community combined with social distancing were necessary to "flatten the curve" and stop our hospitals being overwhelmed.
Almost 12 months later, borders are being closed for just a few positive tests by an admittedly flawed testing procedure, and there is NO MENTION of hospital admissions in media reports. As the vaccine "may not prevent viral transmission" and "does not reduce symptoms" are we going to continue shutdowns forever? Is it realistic to expect to eradicate COVID through lockdowns?
What about the flow-on increase in deaths related to lockdowns from other causes such a suicide or lack of access to other needed medical treatments? Surely these deaths should be factored into decisions regarding further lockdowns or are these deaths not considered meaningful in the decision making process?
Why should we trust Pfizer and other drug companies, assuring us their experimental vaccine is safe, without long term studies, when they have been a "habitual offender" convicted of multiple criminal actions?
Read Matthew and Associates Law firm's article on the criminal history of Pfizer.
"Pfizer drug breach ends in biggest US crime fine" - article by The Guardian 2009
Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR - article in pubmed.gov by Robert G Evans, 2010
"This was by no means Pfizer’s first offence. In 2007, Pfizer subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn paid $34 million and pleaded guilty to paying kickbacks for formulary placement of its drugs and entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for off label distribution of Genotropin, its brand for the human growth hormone somatropin. In 2004 Pfizer subsidiary Warner–Lambert pleaded guilty and paid more than $430 million to resolve criminal charges and civil liability arising from its fraudulent marketing practices with respect to Neurontin, its brand for the drug gabapentin. Originally developed for the treatment of epilepsy, Neurontin was illegally promoted off-label for the treatment of various forms of neurological pain, and in particular for migraine. -Evans (Full paper)"
Astra-Zeneca, Australia's secondary vaccine provider has also paid a $520 million dollar settlement in 2010 due to off-label drug marketing and pleaded guilty to a felony charge of health-care fraud after the company's employees had given illegal financial inducements to as many as 400 doctors across the US to persuade them to prescribe the drug, Zoladex. View more Astra-Zeneca charges
It’s looking more and more likely that the Merck painkiller Vioxx, the blockbuster drug suspected of having caused more than 55,000 deaths from stroke and heart attack before being withdrawn from the market in 2004, actually killed many more people than we previously thought.
https://affiliates.legalexaminer.com/health/vioxx-killed-half-a-million-the-facts-are-grim/
Why are we being told that is a new and 'more deadly' UK strain when the UK government admits no such evidence exists?
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/covid-19-sars-cov-2-information-about-the-new-virus-variant
https://www.rosemaryfrei.ca/laying-out-the-evidence/
If this is a very serious and dangerous pandemic, justifying unprecedented lockdowns and restrictions to our freedom, why was COVID-19 downgraded from a 'high consequence infectious disease' (HCID) in the UK, as of March 2020?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
Editors Note
Note that the mortality rate is stated as "low overall".
How do we know history is not repeating itself with scare tactics being used to push experimental vaccines, with no liability for the manufacturers, when it's been done before?
It's now widely acknowledged that the Swine Flu & Bird Flu scares were exaggerated and did not cause anywhere near the predicted deaths or illnesses - but did ensure pharmaceutical companies made huge amounts of money selling an experimental vaccine that turned out to be the cause of permanent damage to the health of many people - including children.
The NHS now reports "Overall, the outbreak was not as serious as originally predicted, largely because many older people were already immune to it. Most cases in the UK were relatively mild, although there were some serious cases." Sound familiar? (see NHS report)
"The last time the UK rushed a vaccine into use it ended up costing taxpayers millions of pounds in compensation because of a rare complication linked to the Pandemrix vaccine, developed by pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) to protect against swine flu." (see article)
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/false-bird-flu-scare/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/how-safe-covid-vaccine-pfizer-b1765035.html
https://inews.co.uk/news/health/eu-health-commissioner-narcolepsy-swine-flu-vaccine-48685
https://www.aier.org/article/a-retrospective-on-the-avian-flu-scare-of-2005/